FA Go for English, Rather Than The
Best
Newton's third law states that for every action there is an equal
and opposite reaction.
While the great physicist is not known to have been a football
fan he would surely have approved of the Football Association's
religious devotion to his theory. 'You cannae change the laws of
physics, capt'n' - nor apparently the blinked thinking of the FA,
who are on the verge of appointing an under-qualified manager simply
because he is English.
The Association’s thinking when appointing a new English
manager has always been affected by the mood of the nation with
regards to the incumbent. Glenn Hoddle, the seemingly PR friendly
bright young thing, replaced the corrupt Terry Venables. Kevin Keegan,
the man with good, honest passion as his middle name, replaced the
reserved, ultimately perverse Hoddle. And Sven Goran Eriksson, the
thinking man's coach, was absolutely the opposite of heart-on-his-sleeve
Keegan. Action, reaction.
Yet again the pattern repeats itself with the appointment of Steve
McClaren, the former Manchester
United coach turned Middlesboro manager. McClaren is prepared
to hug the touchline, gesticulating wildly while Sven was so heavily
criticised in the press for refusing to do precisely that. More
importantly, McClaren offers the very thing that Eriksson cannot
- his Englishness. It would seem that far from appointing the best,
the FA prefers to appoint the most English.
Reviewing the shortlisted six candidates for the job of England
national manager it becomes apparent that the criteria for appointment
was little to do with McClaren's football CV - skillset, results,
achievements.
Indeed, on the face of it McClaren's five major opponents for the
job would appear to be more plausible appointees:
• Louis Filipe Scolari: celebrated winner of World
Cup 2002 with Brazil. Globally respected and admired. Experienced,
confident, and highly affable with the media. The Brazilian coach
has developed Portugal into a fine team that qualified
for World Cup 2006 with panache. Surely the ideal candidate
and one who desperately wants the job. One of the few men in world
football management whom the English FA should crawl on bended knee
to take on the challenge. FA Verdict: not English enough
• Guus
Hiddink: The current manager of PSV Eindhoven who has consistently
developed teams that equal more than the sum of its parts. As part-time
coach of the Australian national team he has guided the Aussies
to the World Cup for the first time in 32 years. A truly outstanding
achievement. He has also coached at the very highest club level
with Real Madrid, proving he understands the pressures that would
go with becoming England's manager. FA Verdict: not English enough.
• Martin O'Neill: the respected and liked former Celtic
and Leicester manager who turned the hoops fortunes around. He has
a track record of over achieving with limited resources and getting
the best out of a players. In taking Celtic to a UEFA cup final,
only to unluckily lose to Jose Mourinho's Porto, O'Neill also proved
that he can live with the best in the business. He would be a popular
and effective manager who would command an excellent relationship
with the media. FA Verdict: not English enough.
• Alan Curbishley: the Charlton man has performed an admirable
job at Charlton with little or no money. He is well liked by his
peers and at Charlton gets on well with a less-than-hostile media.
Expectations at the South London club are low of course and as such
he can hardly fail. For their sustained position in the Premiership
Curbishley deserves credit but his credentials for the England manager’s
post is harmed by the fact that he has no European or international
experience to draw upon, and crucially has never managed superstar
players before. FA Verdict: too inexperienced.
• Sam Allardyce: the inspirational Bolton manager has transformed
a regional club into realistic contenders for a Champions League
place, on very few resources. His team's playing style is ugly but
effective and he commands the respect of seasoned players in the
dressing room. Allardyce would be safe pair of hands with the team
but he is as yet untested at international or European level. He’s
also very much his own man – no FA puppet here. FA Verdict:
potentially controversial.
While McClaren was known as an innovator at Manchester
United he has actually had very little success at management
level – a Carling Cup final in 2004, and two semi-finals this
season. His teams have been inconsistent with tactics changed almost
by the week, and worryingly his judgment of player potential has
been called into question by some less than successful, but very
expensive purchases.
Moreoever, he has no Champions League experience whatsoever. Despite
the millions invested in his team by Chairman Steve Gibson, McClaren
is yet to deliver. Does this sound like a man to lead one of the
world’s foremost footballing nations?
Yet the FA’s verdict appears to be positive, save for a
last minute change of heart. McClaren after all is media friendly
and is seemingly unlikely to cause any embarrassment to the FA.
Most of all, he is English.
McClaren's appointment is a damning indictment of the little-England
mentality that has been allowed to foster within the walls of Soho
Square. True, press hostility towards Eriksson has almost certainly
been heightened by his nationality – many of the press were
critical from the start.
But in fact, major tournaments aside, the Swede’s record
is excellent in competitive matches. He has suffering just the two
defeats, coming at World Cup 2002 and Euro 2004.
Perhaps the FA’s fourth law should have been appoint the
best, no matter his nationality.
|