Swiss Culture: Swiss Politics, Democracy & Neutrality
Robert Easton
Switzerland
is widely held to be the world's most democratic country.
All any citizen needs to do to challenge a law is collect 50,000
signatures opposing the law in 100 days and a national referendum
must be held.
To challenge the constitution they must collect 100,000 signatures
within 18 months to trigger a referendum, and need a simple majority
of the popular vote and a majority among the states.
This makes Switzerland's democracy the most direct in the
world - in no other country do the citizens have such direct control
over the law.
Recent referendums have been on GM crops (banned for five years),
embryo stem cell research (allowed), joining the UN (formally joined
in 2002), and scrapping the army (idea shot down in flames).
Switzerland is a federal parliamentary democratic republic. The
legislature is divided into two houses. The upper house is called
the Council of States, where each canton (administrative region)
is represented (most cantons have two representatives, six of the
smaller ones only have one each).
The representatives serve four year terms, but in Switzerland's
democratic tradition their mode of election is determined by the
canton they represent, not by the national government.
The lower house is called the National Council of Switzerland,
each canton is a constituency, but larger constituencies have more
representatives, who are chosen according to a system of proportional
representation. Women make up about one quarter of both the upper
and lower houses.
The executive is headed by the Federal Council (a cabinet) which
is elected by parliament, although virtually anyone can be elected.
It is one of the most stable political bodies in the world, from
1959 until 2003 there was no change in the relative number of seats
allocated to each party.
The President and Vice President fulfill largely ceremonial roles
and are elected for one year terms. The current President is politician
and lawyer Moritz Leuenberger.
The main political parties are the Swiss People's Party,
the Social Democratic Party of Switzerland, the Free Democratic
Party of Switzerland, and the Christian Democratic Party of Switzerland.
The rightist Swiss People's Party was traditionally the smallest
party of the four, but doubled its share of the vote between 1987
and 1999 to become the largest single party.
This resulted in it increasing its share of seats on the Federal
Council, by taking one seat from the Christian Democrats in 2003.
By the standards of the Swiss Federal Council this was a political
earthquake.
In 2003 the Swiss People's Party ran a highly controversial
campaign which portrayed illegal immigrants as drug dealers and
criminals.
The party's leader, Christoph Blocher, has been compared by his
opponents to Austria's Joerg
Haider and France's Jean-Marie Le Pen, both of whom are widely
considered to be out and out racists, but it is evident from the
poll results that the 2003 campaign met with approval with more
Swiss than it offended.
Mr Blocher, a billionaire industrialist, strongly objects to accusations
of racism or xenophobia.
The next largest party is the Green Party which took 7.4% of the
vote in 2003, and improvement of 2.4% on the last election. Behind
them is a host of small parties with less than five seats each.
Switzerland's neutrality in international affairs is renowned.
It dates back to 1815 and the Vienna Conference, at which European
States discussed post-Napoleonic relations. Historically, the primary
reason for Switzerland's neutrality was to avoid involvement in
Europe's frequent, bloody and destructive wars.
Switzerland was neutral in both World Wars, refuses to join the
EU, long resisted joining the UN, and only recently started allowing
its soldiers to carry weapons during peacekeeping missions abroad.
Questions about the policy of neutrality are constant both inside
and outside of Switzerland. Some suggest that though fulfilling
the criteria for neutrality under international law, Switzerland
did not adhere to the underlying notions of neutrality because it
exported arms to Nazi Germany and was the depository for gold looted
from Holocaust victims.
Perhaps it is worth bearing in mind the opinion of Winston Churchill:
"She has been the sole international force linking the hideously-sundered
nations and ourselves. What does it matter whether she has been
able to give us the commercial advantages we desire or has given
too many to the Germans, to keep herself alive? She has been a democratic
State, standing for freedom in self defence among her mountains,
and in thought, in spite of race, largely on our side."
There are those who believe that EU integration has moved so far
that there will be no more wars within Europe, and hence that the
policy of neutrality is outdated.
Within Switzerland some feel that non-integration with the EEA
is hurting the economy, but integration would, among other things,
take power away from the regional canton governments, and end a
tradition that has seen Switzerland through some of the most destructive
centuries of European history relatively unscathed.
The question is a complicated one, but it seems unlikely to go
away.
|