The Abdelmajid Oulmers Case - A New,
More Terrible Bosman!?
Ozren Podnar reports...
The Bosman ruling has hurt most clubs from most countries.
The abolition of transfer fees at the end of players' contracts
is not the biggest problem, though.
True, now the club losing a player cannot charge a formation fee
to the club he is going to, unless the contract is terminated before
its expiry date. This has put far more negotiating power in the
hands of the players and their agents. Players can now simply blackmail
the clubs by saying: either you let me go for a lower price, or
I'll sit out the contract and leave free of charge.
A bigger problem was the EU-imposed elimination of players' quotas
related to their nationality. Most leagues around the world have
been devastated by this ruling, which accidentally has nothing at
all to do with Jean-Marc Bosman and his original claim for a free
transfer from Liege to Dunkerque.
The ruling enabled wealthy club owners to drain the soccer resources
from poorer nations, virtually sucking the life out of them. At
the same time, it has wiped out national, let alone regional or
local identities of teams in big footballing nations.
While Arsenal can now field a non-British eleven consisting of
foreign internationals, clubs from Rumania, Hungary, Serbia, Croatia,
Slovakia, Ukraine or Sweden cannot dream of winning another European
cup competition as they used to in the good old days of strict UEFA/FIFA/national
FA-controlled soccer.
On a less dramatic note, a new, more well-to-do and less passionate
breed of supporter has largely superseded the former, more committed
fans who have dropped out since their teams lost their local flavour.
How the EU hurts the many to protect the greedy few
EU-sponsored liberalism has made more soccer fans around the world
more unhappy than happy and FIFA's chairman Sepp Blatter rightly
speaks of EU imperialism changing the face of soccer for the worse.
But, there is a new, even more terrible "Bosman" in
the pipelines. One that will not hurt clubs (any more than they
have already been hurt) but national soccer associations.
The new ruling will be called the "Oulmers ruling",
after the Moroccan Abdelmajid Oulmers. The ruling will benefit wealthy
(and greedy) clubs with the most internationals, and will kill the
national teams of poorer nations, whose players play for - you've
guessed it - the wealthy clubs!
Oulmers's Belgian (again!) club Sporting Charleroi has sued FIFA
because it ruled that the Moroccan had to play for his country last
year against Burkina Faso.
Oulmers then tore his ligaments and spent seven months out of action.
Charleroi consider themselves robbed and seeks compensation from
FIFA. The trial will start in a Belgian civil court, but will certainly
end up at the European Court of Justice, as the Bosman's case did.
The rich clubs, the G-14, have put their weight behind Charleroi,
well, because they lose so many international players every time
their countries play a game. And why on earth do they have so many
foreign players in the first place? Well, the European Union enabled
them to.
The future Oulmers ruling will additionally empower a small group
of clubs, several dozen of them, against everybody else - FIFA,
UEFA, national soccer associations and hundreds of millions of fans
around the world.
Let us see how.
Farewell to national teams
The EU will allow clubs to seek compensation from a national association
(not FIFA or UEFA) for any player injured while on international
duty, perhaps even for any player released to play for their national
team.
If Milan's Shevchenko gets injured while playing for Ukraine, the
Ukrainian FA will have to pay damages to Milan, provided it has
enough money.
Since the poorer FAs will fear incurring debts which they will
not be able to settle, they will refrain from calling up their players
for friendlies, and who knows, maybe even for competitive games.
As a consequence, the national teams of less fortunate countries
will lose their top players, who - obviously - ply their trade in
the richest clubs in England, Italy, Spain, Germany, France, and
a couple of clubs from Greece, Holland, Portugal and Scotland.
All in all, some 20-30 clubs will benefit from the Oulmers ruling,
while legions of fans in Africa, South America, Asia and a large
part of Europe will be robbed of the chance to see their national
team's stars.
The law protects capital, we understand that, but there is no law
or court that protects fan's feelings.
Related Links
|