English Football News: Iain Hume
Andy Greeves on the illegal use of the elbow
As the Football Association continues its 'Respect'
campaign, set on tackling abuse towards match officials, a far greater
of the game's ills has reared its ugly head again.
On November 8, in a Championship game between Barnsley and Sheffield
United, Tykes forward Iain Hume was on the end of a challenge by
Blades Chris Morgan that left him with a fractured skull. An injury
so serious that Hume received emergency brain surgery and remains
in hospital to this day.
Hume's injury was sustained after he was elbowed in the
head by Morgan, a player sent off 12 times in his career to date.
Amazingly Morgan was only booked for the challenge that left Hume
with an 18-inch scar in his head. Even more unbelievably is the
fact that Morgan will receive no further disciplinary action by
the FA. "We can only bring additional charges in the most
exceptional cases and only if it can be proved beyond doubt that
the actions of a player were a deliberate attempt to injure an opponent,"
read an FA statement.
Football fans will share in the hope that there was no malice in
Chris Morgan's challenge, that this was a horrible accident
that will never happen again. Unfortunately the case is Morgan's
defence doesn't look particularly strong. Video replays show
the player aggressively swinging his elbow in Hume's direction
while still standing on the floor. Barnsley are likely to take legal
action against Morgan and/or Sheffield United, with Tykes manager
Simon Davey clear on his views on the incident after the November
8 game.
"Iain received no protection whatsoever from the referee
on Saturday despite him telling Andy D'Urso about repeated
use of the elbow and it sickens me just thinking about it,"
said Davey. "Our thoughts are with Iain at this time and we
all wish him a very speedy recovery from what is a horrendous injury...
He could have died. The decision not to show a red card was an absolute
disgrace."
The misuse of the elbow in the English game is nothing new. In
1992, Torquay United's John Uzzell had his career ended, after
being elbowed in the face by Brentford's Gary Blissett. Uzzell
required reconstructive surgery and was almost blinded by this incident.
Just a year later, Tottenham skipper Gary Mabbutt had his cheek
bone shattered and an eye socket splintered in three sections following
an elbow from John Fashunu. In both cases, no action was taken by
the FA against Blissett or Fashunu. Legal action by Uzzell against
Blissett was also unsuccessful, with a Salisbury court ruling that
violent intent could not be proven.
Nicky Summerbee was another victim of the elbow in 2000, when
the then Wimbledon defender Ben Thatcher caught him in the face.
Despite receiving a red card, Thatcher was banned for just two matches
for the offence. He obviously didn't learn his lesson, as
in 2006 he drove his elbow into Pedro Mendes' head during
a Premiership match between Manchester City and Portsmouth. Mendes
was left unconscious, requiring oxygen at pitch side having suffered
a seizure. This just three weeks after Thatcher had elbowed a player
in the chest, during a pre-season 'friendly'. His victim,
Yang Chungang of Shanghai Shenhua, sustained a career-threatening
collapsed lung as a result.
Thatcher was banned for eight matches by the Football Association
for his elbow on Mendes and fined six weeks wages. There was an
overwhelming feeling within the game that punishment was not severe
enough, especially as such an assault could have landed someone
in prison had in occurred on the street.
Sepp Blatter president of the world governing body Fifa, called
upon the referees to "drive out this new devil, the use of
the elbow as a weapon in football," ahead of the 2006 World
Cup. A tournament which subsequently saw Italy's Daniele de
Rossi leave US striker Brian McBride needing three stitches in his
head, following an incident described by USA coach as "a vicious
elbow that could have broken his (McBride's) face".
Di Rossi's punishment for such a blatant offence was a mere
four match international ban.
The continued obstacle in taking firmer action against players
that use their elbow in an inappropriate way, is the issue of intent.
As it is a natural action for players to raise their elbows when
challenging for a ball aerially, it is an almost impossible task
to decipher the difference between an accidental collision and a
malicious act of violence. One thing is for sure, both FIFA and
UEFA are concerned about its continuing presence in the game. The
most serious concern is that a death could be caused.
Former Scottish referee Hugh Dallas, now a UEFA instructor told
a panel of referees in February that he fears the illegal use of
arms and elbows is also becoming "more and more dangerous".
Dallas emphasized that "aggressive challenges deemed to threaten
the safety of an opponent should warrant a straight red card."
But is this action enough to eradicate the dangerous use of the
elbow? One would think not.
Football associations need to be empowered by FIFA to punish players
that use the elbow as a weapon even if the referee fails to send
the individual off on the day. Legal action must be taken against
offenders and heftier bans, possibly season-long, should be considered.
|