Jo Bonfrere Resigns As South Korea's
Coach - Before He is Pushed
John Duerden reports
It is not often that a coach leaves his post just 80 days after
leading a team to the World Cup but that is what former South Korean
coach Jo Bonfrere did this week - although he would have been fired
the day after.
Even after the 2002 World Cup semi-finalists made sure they had
a crack at the 2006 version, the dour Dutchman wasn't as popular
as he might have been - partly due to patchy performances but also
because of his perceived lack of passion and personality.
Finishing bottom of the East Asian
championships meant that the knives, always near to hand in
the top drawer, were shined and sharpened. The defeat of a near
full-strength Korean team to an inexperienced Saudi Arabian line-up
was the last straw. The media had a field day and the country's
legion of netizens were flexing their fingers behind their keyboards.
The KFA called an emergency meeting for August 23, a meeting which
increasingly looked like marking the end of the Dutchman's 14 month
tenure. On August 22, Bonfrere offered his resignation, a decision
which the committee gratefully accepted.
Leaving the questions of whether the former coach of Nigeria was
'got to' by the KFA or whether the KFA is made up of a bunch of
bumbling buffoons aside - the main question is: Did he deserve to
lose his job?
On the face of it no; he had reached the World Cup and as he said,
after a year in the job had got to know the players and was starting
the process of preparing the team for the World Cup.
In such a situation, results slip down the list of priorities below
trying new players, formations and tactics. If Hiddink had been
fired halfway through his preparation for the World Cup (which included
worse results than Bonfrere's) then 2002 could well have been a
different story.
Because of those achievement three years ago, Bonfrere lamented
the fact that, expectations are high, the media and public focus
on results, comparisons are always being made with the past and
he didn't have enough training time.
Such comments are not unreasonable but could have come from the
mouths of most international coaches around the world. Bonfrere
can feel aggrieved at his dismissal as he reached the World Cup,
but with the vagaries of the Asian qualifying system it was not
a tall order.
Performances were the problem; there weren't enough good ones.
South Korea's problem at the beginning of his 432 day spell was
the fact that the strikers missed a multitude of chances but in
the East Asian Cup, those chances dried up, a much more serious
problem. This is especially true with a defence that has improved
but all too often concedes a soft goal after having little to do
for the other 89 minutes.
The 59-year-old's post match press conferences started to follow
a similar vein. The team's luck would be lamented as would the other
team's onus on defence after getting a lucky goal. When coaches
start to talk about luck, game after game, it is a sign that all
is not well.
Bonfrere's big mistake was not to talk to the media. His reluctance
to do so led to a lack of support for him when things started to
go wrong. As results worsened, his obvious dislike for press conferences
continued and he became more defensive and snappy.
His answers were not the only thing becoming snappy as his dress
sense improved. It is interesting that in his last two games in
charge, Bonfrere swapped his benchwear of a KFA t-shirt for a smart
Hiddink-esque suit, even in temperatures of over 30 degrees Celsius.
The temperatures off the pitch became hotter but Bonfrere simply
had no supporters to protect him; it was easier for a weak-willed
KFA to decide to dismiss him than to continue his employment.
Now they have to find someone else - and quick.
Names already mentioned as possible candidates include Sunderland's
Mick McCarthy, Bruno Metsu and Busan I-Park's Ian
Porterfield.
|